Graves's studio at the American Academy (#9) |
The Portland Municipal Building (1982) |
Graves, sketching in Rome, 1961. He sold some to tourists for $50. |
A Graves sketch of the Villa Borghese, c. 1961 |
A Graves-designed school building |
Enrico del Debbio building, 1931-33 |
The Rome drawings that fill the early pages of Brian M. Ambroziak's Michael Graves: the Grand Tour (2005) are mostly of ancient Rome--the Coliseum, the Basilica of Maxentius, the Arch of Constantine--or of Renaissance/Baroque Rome--the Aqua Paola Fountain, Santa Maria Maggiore, Villa Borghese. He was particularly taken with the buildings and ornamentation of Francesco Borromini. But Rome's monumental and rationalist architectures of the 20th century were there to be seen, too, and it seems to us that some of Graves's later works draw as much on these buildings--essentially, the aesthetics of the Fascist era--as they do on earlier periods. (See comparison in photos above).
Graves, the Denver Public Library |
Rome transformed Graves, but that experience was iconic in a larger way, too. By 1960, existing movements in architecture and the arts had reached a point of exhaustion. In painting, abstract expressionists had reduced the form to an extreme of simplicity: a canvas painted in one color. There was nothing beyond, except perhaps not to paint the canvas at all. The rectagular glass box had done the same in architecture, showcasing a rigid and extreme modernism that suggested that the form, having been perfected, was untouchable. They ran out of ideas in Detroit, too, desperately attaching huge, space-like fins on the new models in an awkward, failed effort to tap the future.
Rome gave Graves--and, in the larger sense, architecture--its new direction: it would draw on the past, the collective past, on the buildings of Rome and Athens, on Egypt's pyramids, on the monumentalism of the ancients, on the towers of medieval Europe, on English furniture of the 18th century, on the fascist aesthetic, on the colors of Italy. The past was complex and seemingly limitless and, for better or for worse, it would fuel the architectural resurgence of the late-20th century. What Graves found in Rome was the raw material of the postmodern aesthetic experience.
Why Graves would start thinking about designing commercial products while in Rome is less clear, but he was hardly alone in connecting the artistic and commercial. In 1962, while Graves was wrapping up his European sojourn, Andy Warhol was having his first important solo exhibitions in Los Angeles and New York, featuring representations of Campbell's Soup cans and Coca-Cola bottles. Graves designed products; Warhol used products to make designs. Both understood the limits of modernism; both had a playful side; both drew on the unparalleled dynamism of American consumer culture to revitalize aesthetic forms.
There was one big difference--well, surely more than one, but one that's especially relevant here. Warhol cared little about the past, and he had not been to Rome--at least, not that we know of. Where Graves discovered the a glorious past that could be fashioned into the future, Warhol imagined only irrelevance. "They call Rome 'the Eternal City,' he wrote, "because everything is old and everything is still standing. They always say, 'Rome wasn't built in a day.' Well, I say maybe it should have been, because the quicker you build something, the shorter a time it lasts, and the shorter a time it lasts, the sooner people have jobs again, replacing it. Replacing it keeps people busy."
Bill
We highly recommend Brian M. Ambroziak's lovely book, Michael Graves: Images of a Grand Tour (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2005). Foreword by Michael Graves.
Title: Michael Graves: The Rome Connection
Rating: 100% based on 99998 ratings. 5 user reviews.
Author 1:31 AM
Rating: 100% based on 99998 ratings. 5 user reviews.
Author 1:31 AM